”Innovation? Wait and see’
Column Evert Visser
People tend to hesitate before taking the leap to buy new products or use innovative services. Which is a pity since it causes innovative solutions to take a long time to fully bloom.
The same goes for the world of banking. Communicating with consumers and properly informing them is key.
Roll camera
A certain reserve amongst consumers once again became apparent when we were shooting for the second part of our Disruptive Banking reports. We asked visitors of the Albert Cuyp market in Amsterdam what they thought of cellphones doubling as credit cards, debit cards, membership cards or even electronic door keys. We also probed the enthusiasm for ATMs that accept cash deposits or can get you insured or credit cards with free gift plans.

Roll camera. A woman has the following to say about a cellphone doubling as a banking device: “I’m not sure whether that would really be for me. I think I’d wait to see what others think of it.”
Another lady, a little down the road near another market stand, is afraid of losing her multi-functional cellphone. “You’d lose a lot of information all at once, and the cellphone might become a little too interesting for others.” Responses that reveal a level of doubt based – I think – on a lack of knowledge. Don’t worry. Payments made with the cellphone will be secured with a PIN code.

No experience
Although some people showed genuine interest in banking innovation, a lot of the responses displayed a general lack of faith. Why is this? Besides the aforementioned lack of knowledge, people have trouble imagining doing things differently, partly because they don’t know anybody who has any experience with the new products or services. The hands-on experience of a friend or relative with a certain product usually has a bigger impact than a full spread article in the newspapers. Another likely reason for the negative attitude is the amount of criticism received by banks over the past year.
The film continues and we notice a number of people being less than enthusiastic about getting presents from banks.

Narrow mindedness
“If I want to receive presents, I’ll look on the Internet.” And “If I want to buy a new kitchen, it annoys me if I get offered a chance to win a trip to Italy. I just want a new kitchen, nothing more, nothing less.” A good example, I think, of Dutch narrow mindedness.
I remain positive, because it always takes a little time for innovative concepts to properly settle in society. When the Internet started gaining ground towards the end of the nineties, a lot of people were still skeptical. And look at the net now! It’s almost like the Internet has always been there and more importantly: it’s almost like we can’t do without. Which I think is actually the case.


June 8th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Hi, in my opinion this is an interesting column, but I don’t think bankinnovation at all times meet the need of development needs. In my opinion it isn’t the right way for banks to offers their clients products that have nothing to do with financial products that banks normally extend. Why not? Banks can better focus on their primary business so they can offer 100% capability. In Holland we say ’schoenmaker, blijf bij je leest’.
June 9th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
J.Elliot: Of course, all products a bank offers should be solid and should be executed to the best of their abilities. But we still need innovation. Not innovation in the sense of: let’s make up another fuzzy investment scheme so we can clear even more money from our clients’ pockets, but innovation in the sense of taking a new approach to banking.
June 23rd, 2009 at 12:19 am
I am sorry..i think the best way to make a succes of a new idea or a new brand is to deliver the message clearly. Look at internet banking..only 5-6 years ago nobody was even thinking of dooing their banking businnes only by internet. today there are more than 12 milj. people active on the internet, with personal banking.
The only isseu about digitalization iz the way it’s brought.
People are supporting theirselfs, but aloso paying more for their own self-supprot as before.
In te meanwhile banks shout contact their clients more and i think we have to go back in time, and personolised more. When someone you know veru whell is telling you how to use a new item or even “purchase” you te make an investment (any type) still works the best.
June 3rd, 2010 at 9:57 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by evert visser, evert visser. evert visser said: MOETEN bedrijven innoveren in deze tijd? Zie mijn collumn http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/ [...]