<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8221;Innovation? Wait and see&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/</link>
	<description>The world of banking scrutinized</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention MOETEN bedrijven innoveren in deze tijd? Zie mijn collumn -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention MOETEN bedrijven innoveren in deze tijd? Zie mijn collumn -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptivebanking.com/?p=1188#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by evert visser, evert visser. evert visser said: MOETEN bedrijven innoveren in deze tijd? Zie mijn collumn http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by evert visser, evert visser. evert visser said: MOETEN bedrijven innoveren in deze tijd? Zie mijn collumn <a href="http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/" rel="nofollow">http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bart</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptivebanking.com/?p=1188#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I am sorry..i think the best way to make a succes of a new idea or a new brand is to deliver the message clearly. Look at internet banking..only 5-6 years ago nobody was even thinking of dooing their banking businnes only by internet. today there are more than 12 milj. people active on the internet, with personal banking.
The only isseu about digitalization iz the way it&#039;s brought.
People are supporting theirselfs, but aloso paying more for their own self-supprot as before.
In te meanwhile banks shout contact their clients more and i think we have to go back in time, and personolised more. When someone you know veru whell is telling you how to use a new item or even &quot;purchase&quot; you te make an investment (any type) still works the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry..i think the best way to make a succes of a new idea or a new brand is to deliver the message clearly. Look at internet banking..only 5-6 years ago nobody was even thinking of dooing their banking businnes only by internet. today there are more than 12 milj. people active on the internet, with personal banking.<br />
The only isseu about digitalization iz the way it&#8217;s brought.<br />
People are supporting theirselfs, but aloso paying more for their own self-supprot as before.<br />
In te meanwhile banks shout contact their clients more and i think we have to go back in time, and personolised more. When someone you know veru whell is telling you how to use a new item or even &#8220;purchase&#8221; you te make an investment (any type) still works the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptivebanking.com/?p=1188#comment-139</guid>
		<description>J.Elliot: Of course, all products a bank offers should be solid and should be executed to the best of their abilities. But we still need innovation. Not innovation in the sense of: let&#039;s make up another fuzzy investment scheme so we can clear even more money from our clients&#039; pockets, but innovation in the sense of taking a new approach to banking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.Elliot: Of course, all products a bank offers should be solid and should be executed to the best of their abilities. But we still need innovation. Not innovation in the sense of: let&#8217;s make up another fuzzy investment scheme so we can clear even more money from our clients&#8217; pockets, but innovation in the sense of taking a new approach to banking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.disruptivebanking.com/2009/05/20/innovation-wait-and-see/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disruptivebanking.com/?p=1188#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Hi, in my opinion this is an interesting column, but I don&#039;t think bankinnovation at all times meet the need of  development needs. In my opinion it isn&#039;t the right way for banks to offers their clients products that have nothing to do with financial products that banks normally extend. Why not? Banks can better focus on their primary business so they can offer 100% capability. In Holland we say &#039;schoenmaker, blijf bij je leest&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, in my opinion this is an interesting column, but I don&#8217;t think bankinnovation at all times meet the need of  development needs. In my opinion it isn&#8217;t the right way for banks to offers their clients products that have nothing to do with financial products that banks normally extend. Why not? Banks can better focus on their primary business so they can offer 100% capability. In Holland we say &#8217;schoenmaker, blijf bij je leest&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
